At a Kam­pala sum­mer school, 70 scho­lars tack­led Africa’s wealth ine­qua­lity, unco­ve­ring the pivo­tal role of land owner­ship in sha­ping eco­no­mic divi­des. Insights spark change.

Die Autoren

Jakob Kapel­ler ist Pro­fes­sor und geschäfts­füh­ren­der Direk­tor am ifso. Zudem lei­tet er das Insti­tut für die Gesamt­ana­lyse der Wirt­schaft (ICAE). Schwer­punkte: Öko­no­mi­scher und sozia­ler Wan­del und Plu­rale Ökonomik.

Paul Kliesch ist wis­sen­schaft­li­che Hilfs­kraft am Insti­tut für Sozio­öko­no­mie und stu­diert im MA Sozio­öko­no­mie.

The gap bet­ween rich and poor is widening, also in Afri­can count­ries. Alre­ady, Afri­can wealth ine­qua­li­ties are among the hig­hest in glo­bal com­pa­ri­son. To bet­ter ana­lyze the dyna­mics behind this, a group of about seventy ambi­tious scho­lars gathe­red for a sum­mer school on „Wealth Ine­qua­lity Stu­dies in Africa“ in Kam­pala, Uganda in Sep­tem­ber 2024. This was made pos­si­ble through the joint orga­niza­tion by Resty Naiga (Make­rere Uni­ver­sity), Jakob Kapel­ler (Uni­ver­sity of Duis­burg-Essen), and Howard Stein (Uni­ver­sity of Michi­gan), as well as the finan­cial sup­port of the Volks­wa­gen Foun­da­tion.

Jakob Kapel­ler and Howard Stein kicked off the pro­gram with an intro­duc­tion to the importance of hete­ro­dox eco­no­mics in the con­text of East Afri­can wealth ine­qua­li­ties. In the fol­lo­wing days, spea­k­ers such as The­resa Auma Eilu (Land and Equity Move­ment Uganda), Aroop Chat­ter­jee (Uni­ver­sity of the Wit­wa­ters­rand), and Faus­tin Maganga (St. John’s Uni­ver­sity) shared their expe­ri­en­ces from rese­arch pro­jects in Uganda, South Africa, and Tan­z­a­nia. As it became evi­dent that land con­flicts are cen­tral to wealth ine­qua­li­ties in these regi­ons, Wil­liam John Walwa (Uni­ver­sity of Dar es Salaam) and Emma­nuel Sulle (Aga Khan Uni­ver­sity) ela­bo­ra­ted fur­ther on this point in their lectures.

The dis­cus­sion became espe­ci­ally lively when Doreen Kobusin­gye (Natio­nal Land Coali­tion Uganda) high­ligh­ted the par­ti­cu­lar bur­den women face when it comes to wealth ine­qua­li­ties. Here, dif­fe­rent (cul­tu­ral) under­stan­dings of „nor­mal“ eco­no­mic acti­vity became appa­rent among the spea­k­ers. To fur­ther­more give a sense for the poli­ti­cal eco­no­mic back­ground of these issues, Jörg Wie­gratz (Uni­ver­sity of Leeds) and God­frey Asi­imwe (Make­rere Uni­ver­sity) rai­sed awa­re­ness for class issues and the influence of neo­li­be­ral poli­cies in East Africa.

After atten­tively lis­tening to these pre­sen­ta­ti­ons and pas­sio­na­tely dis­cus­sing their argu­ments, the par­ti­ci­pants were given the task of deve­lo­ping their own rese­arch pro­po­sals. Once again, a recur­ring theme emer­ged that see­med to fun­da­men­tally shape the per­cep­tion of wealth ine­qua­li­ties in East Africa: the owner­ship and use of land as a cen­tral deter­mi­nant of indi­vi­dual wealth. This topic sparked the most vigo­rous ques­tio­ning of the exis­ting poli­ti­cal, eco­no­mic, and social con­di­ti­ons. During seve­ral highly enligh­tening deba­tes, par­ti­ci­pants dis­played a deep under­stan­ding of the con­flicts bet­ween rich and poor, bet­ween govern­ments and citi­zens, bet­ween local and inter­na­tio­nal com­pa­nies, and bet­ween the glo­bal North and the glo­bal South.

This led the small group of stu­dents from the Uni­ver­sity of Duis­burg-Essen who par­ti­ci­pa­ted in the sum­mer school to rea­lize in how far ques­ti­ons of wealth dis­tri­bu­tion are con­text-spe­ci­fic. As sub­sis­tence needs and wealth assets tend to be more clo­sely tied in the Glo­bal South, dif­fe­rent eco­no­mic pathways have to emerge than in the Glo­bal North. For exam­ple, while tra­di­tio­nal stances of eco­no­mic text­books always advo­cate for the for­ma­liza­tion of pro­perty rights, prac­ti­cal expe­ri­en­ces in East Africa show that the for­ma­liza­tion of land rights can also be accom­pa­nied by costs that hin­der the effec­tive use of land and thus con­flict with the needs of affec­ted households.

For the Ger­man stu­dents, the sum­mer school thus became a cul­tu­ral expe­ri­ence. They saw an impres­sive per­for­mance of tra­di­tio­nal dance from the Bug­anda king­dom. They were intro­du­ced to East Afri­can cui­sine, inclu­ding dis­hes such as Matooke, Luwombo, and East Afri­can spi­ced tea (google it!). And they had the oppor­tu­nity to learn about and ques­tion their own study con­tent from an East Afri­can perspective.

Inte­res­t­ingly, les­sons also came from Uber and Boda Boda dri­vers as they impres­sed with their excel­lent ana­ly­ses of Uganda’s eco­no­mic situa­tion. Sur­pri­sing? Not really. Many of them are uni­ver­sity gra­dua­tes. The fact that they are now working as taxi dri­vers is part of the eco­no­mic rea­lity in Uganda, which doesn’t fol­low the pre­mi­ses of human capi­tal theory and offers many well-edu­ca­ted young peo­ple no sui­ta­ble employ­ment pro­s­pects. Hop­efully, the par­ti­ci­pants will explore the pro­ces­ses behind this in more depth in the future. The sum­mer school has taken a first step in that direc­tion. We leave it inspi­red, con­nec­ted, and full of drive.